All three are very good and have different approaches, each with pros and cons. You're better off sticking with the usual suspects, like Mixing Light, Ripple Training, and FXPHD.

I think when it comes to free tutorials, generally, you get what you pay for. I much prefer dealing with the informed idiots. Or it's an uninformed idiot making wild claims about stuff they don't really know about. I see quite a few tutorials that try to explain one thing and one minute in I just roll my eyes and think, 'this idiot has no idea what he (or she) is talking about.' Too often, the 'free' tutorials out there are actually trying to sell you something. It requires a lot of thought and study to come up with a 'color correction philosophy' that gets the best possible results in the least amount of time. It is possible to 'damage' the signal enough early on that it causes irreparable damage.Ĥ) be mindful about overcorrecting the image, to the point where (say) node #7 actually undoes a lot of the work being done by node #2. If you screw up an image early in the signal path no amount of adjustment can really undo the damage despite the 32-bit depth of Resolve. The best general rules I can give:ġ) don't try to color-correct without scopesĢ) don't try to color-correct without a calibrated displayģ) be very careful about order of operations (which goes for any software, not just Resolve). Click to expand.I think that would require a book to answer.

Best free luts for davinci resolve 12.5